Superior Court upholds $187.6m class action against Wal-Mart

The state Superior Court has upheld a $187.6m class action award against retail titan Wal-Mart over allegations that its Pennsylvania employees were not properly compensated for off-the-clock work and missed rest breaks.

At the same time, the panel of judges John L. Musmanno and Christine L. Donohue and Senior judge James J. Fitzgerald III also found that the $45.6m in attorney fees Philadelphia Common Pleas Court judge Mark I. Bernstein awarded to law firms Donovan Searles & Axler in Philadelphia, Abbey Spanier Rodd Abrams & Paradis in New York, Bader & Associates of Denver, and Azar & Associates of Aurora, Colo., must be recalculated.

Bernstein "inadvertently double-counted" the firms' contingency fee rates, the panel said in a 211-page per curiam opinion released today.

When Bernstein granted the class counsels to apply a contingency multiplier of 3.7 to their total counsel fees of $12.34m and $3.58m in expenses for the work of 26 lawyers and 17 paralegals, among others, he did not take into account that Donovan Searles, as well as Abbey Spanier, had already factored the risk of a contingency fee into their rates, the panel said. The other firms calculated their rates based on their complex litigation hourly rates.

(Published by Law.com - June 10, 2011)

latest top stories

subscribe |  contact us |  sponsors |  migalhas in portuguese |  migalhas latinoamérica