Settlements
Glaxo said to have paid $1 billion over Paxil suits
GlaxoSmithKline Plc has agreed to pay more than $1 billion to resolve more than 800 cases alleging its Paxil antidepressant caused birth defects in some users' children, according to people familiar with the settlements.
The accords, which provide an average payout of more than $1.2 million to families of affected children, leave more than 100 birth-defect cases still pending, the people said. Officials of Glaxo, the U.K.'s biggest drugmaker, said July 15 they set aside $2.4 billion to resolve litigation over Paxil and its Avandia diabetes drug.
"It looks as if this should be covered in the liabilities to be charged in the second-quarter numbers," Nick Turner, an analyst at Mirabaud Securities in London, said in an interview today. "If there are further liabilities to be disclosed in the third-quarter numbers, that would be very disappointing."
The birth-defect settlements bring to more than $2 billion the amount Glaxo has agreed to pay to resolve a variety of Paxil-related suits, including claims it caused suicides or attempted suicides and addiction problems, the people said.
Glaxo officials confirmed yesterday they agreed to settle some Paxil birth-defect cases filed against the drugmaker. They refused to comment the terms of the settlements.
"The company has agreed to these settlements, despite its litigation defenses, in order to avoid the costs, burdens and uncertainties of ongoing litigation," Sarah Alspach, a Glaxo spokeswoman, said in an e-mailed statement.
$11.7 Billion in Sales
"GSK believes it acted properly and responsibly in conducting its clinical trial program, in marketing the medicine, in monitoring its safety once it was approved for use and in updating pregnancy information in the medicine's label as new information became available," Alspach added.
Approved in 1992 for U.S. use, Paxil generated about 523 million pounds ($793 million) in sales in 2009, or about 1.8 percent of Glaxo's total revenue. The company had $11.7 billion in U.S. Paxil sales for nine years starting in 1997, according to documents made public last year in a Pennsylvania trial over birth-defect claims.
Chief Executive Officer Andrew Witty has moved to replace revenue lost to generic versions of drugs such as Paxil. The drugmaker said in May it plans to double revenue from India and China by 2015 as it cuts prices to match competitors in emerging markets.
The $2.4 billion charge Glaxo announced for Paxil and Avandia litigation "includes provisioning for settled cases" and those still outstanding, officials said in an e-mailed statement.
No Breakdown
The charge "reflects the company's ongoing efforts to resolve certain long-standing legal cases,” Dan Troy, the company's general counsel, said in the release. "This represents a substantial portion of GSK's outstanding litigation."
Alspach refused today to specify how much of the $2.4 billion charge is devoted to resolving Paxil litigation and how much has been set aside to deal with Avandia lawsuits. She also declined to say how much of the reserve will be used to pay the company’s legal fees for both cases.
The company has agreed to pay more than $500 million so far to settle suits alleging Avandia posed an increase risk of heart attacks and strokes in diabetics, people familiar with those accords said earlier this month.
Philadelphia Award
The birth-defect settlements came after a Philadelphia jury ordered Glaxo in October to pay $2.5 million in damages to the family of Lyam Kilker, a 3-year-old boy born with a heart defect after his mother took Paxil while pregnant.
In Kilker's case, jurors concluded Glaxo officials "negligently failed to warn" the doctor treating Lyam's mother about Paxil’s risks and concluded the medicine was a "factual cause" of the child's heart defects. The panel declined to award punitive damages against the drugmaker.
During the Kilker trial, the family's lawyers made public internal Glaxo documents showing executives talked about burying negative studies about Paxil's links to birth defects and that its own scientists were alarmed by the rising number of children who had been affected by the drug in the womb.
After the verdict in Kilker's case, an analyst estimated the company may be facing more than $1 billion in additional verdicts in the more than 600 birth-defect cases waiting to be tried in Pennsylvania.
Kilker Case Settled
"A liability totaling $1.5 billion is possible," Savvas Neophytou, a Panmure Gordon analyst in London, wrote in a note to investors the day after the verdict. He still recommended buying Glaxo shares because the award was likely to be reduced on appeal.
The majority of the birth-defect suits filed in Philadelphia have been settled, including Kilker's case, the people familiar with the accords said. Sean Tracey, the attorney who represented Kilker's family in the case, declined to comment on the settlement.
Other lawyers who have settled their Paxil cases include Mark Robinson and Karen Menzies, two Los Angeles-based attorneys, and Clayton Clark, a Houston-based plaintiffs' lawyer, the people said. Robinson and Menzies didn't return calls for comment. Clark declined to comment on the settlement of his more than 500 cases.
Attorneys who continue to press birth-defect claims against Glaxo include Houston litigators Andy Vickery and Ed Blizzard, the people said. Alspach noted yesterday that Glaxo is facing three birth-defect cases that are set for trial in Philadelphia in September.
Blizzard didn't return a call for comment. Vickery said he was preparing for one of the September trials and wouldn’t comment on whether he’d had settlement talks with Glaxo.
Glaxo fell 13 pence, or 1.1 percent, to 1,175 pence as of 1:28 p.m. in London trading. The stock is down 11 percent this year.
The Philadelphia birth-defect case was Kilker v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. dba GlaxoSmithKline, 07-001813, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).
(Published by Bloomberg – July 20, 2010)
_______________
__________
Read more
7/13/2010 - Glaxo said to pay $460 Million to settle Avandia lawsuits – click here.