Chevron bid to dismiss $18bn judgment rejected in Ecuador

Chevron Corp.'s effort to overturn an $18bn judgment against it was rejected by an Ecuador appeals court in a lawsuit alleging the company is responsible for chemicals spilled in the Amazon River basin more than 20 years ago.

The "adverse ruling" upholding the lower-court judgment was issued by a panel of three judges in the Provincial Court of Justice of Sucumbios in Lago Agrio, Ecuador, Chevron said in an e-mailed statement yesterday.

Chevron appealed a February ruling that it was responsible for chemical-laden wastewater dumped in jungle land from 1964 to about 1992 by Texaco Inc., which Chevron acquired in 2001.

The "decision is another glaring example of the politicization and corruption of Ecuador's judiciary that has plagued this fraudulent case from the start," Chevron said in its statement. The company "does not believe that the Ecuador ruling is enforceable in any court that observes the rule of law."

The appeals court ratified the February ruling "in all of its parts, including the conviction for moral reparation or its alternative and costs," according to the decision.

Chevron is still reviewing the ruling and hasn't decided what it will do next, Kent Robertson, a spokesman for the San Ramon, California-based company, said yesterday in a phone interview. He said the company "has a procedural right to seek clarification and amplification from the court that issued this ruling."

Chevron's options

Chevron can also appeal the decision to the next level of Ecuador's judiciary, Robertson said.

Karen Hinton, a spokeswoman for lawyers representing the Ecuador residents who sued Chevron, said in an e-mailed statement, "The decision by an independent appellate court is yet further confirmation of Chevron's extraordinary greed and criminal misconduct in Ecuador."

Chevron, the second-largest U.S. oil producer after Exxon Mobil Corp., filed a claim in 2009 against Ecuador in the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague seeking orders that it has no liability for the environmental pollution and that PetroEcuador, the state-owned oil company that took over the site, should pay the damage award. In those proceedings, Ecuador was told in February to prevent enforcement of the judgment until further order by the tribunal, Chevron said today.

In September, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York overturned a lower-court decision blocking enforcement of the award by the court in Ecuador.

'Play Out'

"We are going to have to watch this play out through the international court system and the U.S. court system," Brian Youngberg, an Edward Jones analyst in St. Louis, said in a phone interview.

"It is going to be dragged out," said Youngberg, who rates Chevron shares a "buy" and doesn't own any.

Investors still expect the ultimate outcome won't "cost the company," Youngberg said. "There is really very little that Ecuador can go after in the country and Chevron doesn't really have any material assets there."

Ecuador President Rafael Correa said he was "very content" with the ruling.

"I believe justice has been done," Correa said on public radio station Radio Publica. "More or less it's like David versus Goliath."

(Published by Bloomberg - January 4, 2012)